Rural Developmet
AN INTEGRATED RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT DESIGNED TO REDUCE RURAL POVERTY
AND ENCOURAGE SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT
The Appraisal Report of the St. Lucia Rural Enterprise
Project published in 1995, cited the principal problem facing resource-poor
rural households in St. Lucia and other Windward Island States as their
over-reliance on bananas as a source of income. At the same time, the
traditionally protected and secure banana market in the United Kingdom was
becoming increasingly uncertain, and impending market liberalization within the
context of the European Union threatened to force many marginal producers out
of production.
To address this issue, the International Fund for
Agricultural Development (IFAD) developed a strategy for the Windward Island
States to help resource-poor rural households adjust to changing economic
conditions. Out of this strategy The St. Lucia Rural Enterprise Project
(SL-REP) was born. Its main objective to offer smallholders and other
resource-poor rural households, particularly women-headed households, the
option to broaden their income base and reduce risk through the encouragement
of a wide range of productive activities. This objective supported the
Government of St. Lucia (GOSL) policies regarding national economic
diversification and support for farmers marginalized by the changing banana
industry.
The Project activities would be concentrated in the South of
the island covering Canaries, Choiseul, Laborie, Vieux Fort and Micoud in an
attempt to maximize the use of available funds.The project would be of a
six-year duration and began in May 1997 and is expected to end in May 2003. The
total costs of the Project are estimated at US$ 4.7 million. IFAD will provide
46% of the funding, the Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) 20%, the GOSL will
provide counterpart funding representing 33% of project costs and project
beneficiaries in-kind contribution are expected to be 1% of total Project
costs.
The St. Lucia Rural Enterprises Project comprises of five
principal components and all project activities would fall under one of these
components based on the type of activity. A brief description of these
components follow: -
(a) Production
Component – to expand viable income earning opportunities for poor rural
households in crop and livestock production, fish processing and development of
other microenterprises.
(b) Marketing
Component – to improve the national capacity for generating and disseminating
marketing information and market promotion and to strengthen the capability for
meeting quality requirements of all markets on a sustainable basis.
(c) Credit
Component – to assist rural households to access credit for crop and livestock
production, establishment or expansion of micro-enterprises including
agro-processing and other non-farm activities.
(d) Community
Development and Mobilization Component – to provide a mechanism for
community-level decision-making regarding allocation of Project resources and
effective beneficiary participation in the implementation and operation of the
Project.
(e) Project
Coordination, Monitoring and Evaluation – to provide a team of consultants to
manage the implementation of the Project effectively and to transfer skills to
Project beneficiaries.
The St. Lucia Rural Enterprise Project has just completed
its third year of operation. Several projects have made serious headway, but
some others are still weak and further attention is undoubtedly required if the
desired objectives are to be achieved. The reasons for the success or failure
of any one Project activity are varied and in some cases complex and
multi-faceted. Although a meticulous analysis of these factors are not the
focus of this article, it must be said here that their proper documentation is
of critical importance not only for the improvement in implementation of future
Project activities, but also for consultation and use in the design of future
rural development projects in St. Lucia and in the region as a whole.
Experience has shown that for rural development concepts to
take root in resource poor rural communities, some level of community
organization is required. Community-level organization is weak in most rural
communities in the island. It was therefore understood, that if Project
activities were to have any real impact on the poor rural households that it
intended to target, that some form of local management team was to be created.
This realization brought about the birth of the Community Implementation and
Advisory Committee or commonly referred to by its acronym, CIAC. These
Committees are basically local decision-making bodies which in a sense can be
characterized as extensions of the Project Coordination Team (PCT). They are
responsible for identifying potential beneficiaries for Project assistance,
identifying community projects to further the development of their communities,
community mobilization, promotion of SL-REP at the community level and also
provide the Project Coordination Team with general information to guide the
decision-making process for activities in their respective communities.
The extent of the importance of the CIACs’ to the whole
rural development initiative can best be highlighted in the words of the
Project Coordinator Mr. David Demacque when he states that, “with the existence
of the CIACs the triangle is now inverted, they representing the larger community
group whose directives based on the specific needs of their respective
communities, is passed down to the Project Coordination Team, who in turn can
put the necessary structures in place to see that these needs are met.”
To date thirteen (13) CIACs have been created in the Project
target region to represent the large number of communities in the south and are
at various stages of organization and strengthening since they were not all
formed at the same time rather over a two-year period. These CIACs can be found
operating from the following areas: - Mon Repos, Fond St. Jacques, Canaries, Bouton,
Choiseul West, Choiseul East, Saltibus, Laborie, Banse, Grace, Vieux Fort
North, Desruisseaux and Ti Rocher. Some of these CIACs are very active and
have, or are currently undertaking various projects which will greatly enhance
the lives of peoples in their respective communities. The Choiseul East CIAC
have been instrumental in the construction of lockers for the fishermen of
River Doree and this would undoubtedly reduce the high incidence of theft of
their fishing gear and equipment which prevailed in the past.
The Fond St. Jacque, Saltibus and Canaries CIACs have been active
in mobilizing their communities to construct ecotourism trails. The Project has
provided training to several tourguides to work on the Canaries ecotourism
trail. The Fond St. Jacque-Saltibus trail is still under construction. These
activities are funded by the Project, but for the most part are carried out by
members of the respective communities through CIAC mobilization and would no
doubt provide a much-needed source of income for these communities. To date
CIAC membership stands at 320 with 70% of that number being female. Our
experience is showing that women are at the forefront of these community
development initiatives.
DEMOSTRATION AND TRAINING
SL-REP have planned the construction/renovation of Community
Resource Centers (CRC) in Mon Repos, La Maze, Mongouge and Fond St. Jacque. The
intention here is to create a forum for technology transfer and training of
community members in these areas that would lead to the kind of community
empowerment that lies at the heart of the Project. The Project has also taken
on the revamping of the Delcer Irrigation canal. This project is projected to
significantly increase the productive capacity of farming households in the
areas which the canal serves. A local Canal Management Group has been put in
place to oversee the operations of the Canal. The Project also emphasizes Land
Resource Management and encourages the use of soil conservation measures among
community members and especially among agricultural credit beneficiaries. The
Project has financed the setting up of demonstration plots of yams on hillsides
in Regions 2, 3, 4 and 5. Dasheen demonstration plots are planned for the Fond
St. Jacque area. It is expected that farmers visiting these sites would learn
proper agronomic practices for the hillside cultivation of these crops and also
appreciate the benefits of actual soil conservation measures.
Through CIAC mobilization and other Project initiatives,
various training programmes are sponsored by the Project for community members.
These include Cake Decorating, Business Skills Training, Group Dynamics and
Credit Management and requests for many other types of training have been
received, of which the Project will attempt to carry out. Many of these
training courses target single-parent women heads of households. Results have
been very encouraging and several participants, especially from the cake
decorating courses have been able to augment their household income through
direct application of their newly acquired skills. The Project hopes that the
economic empowerment of these women would engender further community
development and improve the overall standard of living in these communities.
The Project
understands that one of the main factors mitigating against involvement in
productive activities among rural folk is the lack of credit facilities, and
where they do exist, the rural poor feel alienated to the extent that they do
not approach these institutions for credit even if they are eligible. Under the
Project’s Credit Component, the entire process of accessing credit has been
simplified and the Project works closely with the Choiseul, Laborie and Saltibus Credit
Unions. These Credit Unions have received assistance from the Project to strengthen
their institutions. The NFCCU have also been given a proposal for Institutional
Strengthening and Agri-Business Development and bids have been sent out to five
consultants to undertake the training. To date a number of agriculture ventures
and microenterprises have benefited from this initiative. These in turn have
served to provide increase employment in the target region and improve the
livelihood of these beneficiaries and their families where they have been
successful. But as we shall see later, this initiative have not always
functioned the way it was perceived in the appraisal report and there are a
number of factors influencing its overall direction. The Project has strived to
engender a business approach into these loan beneficiaries ensuring that all
new loan beneficiaries undertake a business skills training course before any
monies are disbursed.
MOVING THE MARKETING
BOTTLENECKS
The Cassava crop is extensively cultivated in the Project’s
target region, and has been identified as having the potential to be a good
alternative crop to bananas by the Project. A Cassava survey was carried out to
determine the actual status of Cassava production in the South of the island
and also to give some indication as to the potential for large-scale production
and processing of the crop. The idea is to establish a Cassava Processing Plant
in the Vigé-Cacoa area. A U.S. base company, Compatible Technologies
Incorporated (CTI), will largely finance this project while SL-REP will provide
counterpart funding. This facility is expected to reduce significantly the
length of time taken to process cassava into farine and other products and also
eliminate the tediousness of the process. The Plant is expected to be in
operation before the end of this year.
Probably one of the biggest problems facing local producers
is the difficulty in marketing their produce. SL-REP has recognized this
deficiency and the Project’s policy in all productive activities is one of
linking the producer to the buyer. The Project will not encourage the
production of any good or service without first assuring that there is an
outlet for it. This non-traditional approach have brought about several
breakthroughs for the Project. The Fresh Produce Exporters Association (FPEA)
has been able to secure a commercial agreement with a major fresh produce
distributor in Miami, and were also able to secure cargo space on two major
airlines, Fine Air and Virgin Atlantic through a trade mission sponsored by the
Project. Also the project has worked at institutional capacity building of the Praslin
Seamoss Farmers Association, and recently a market was identified in Miami for Seamoss.
Negotiations are presently ongoing to fine-tune a commercial arrangement. These
initiatives ensures an influx of valuable foreign exchange and also ensures the
creation of local employment in these activities.
The Project is also sensitizing people to the consumption of
rabbit meat, principally through its rabbit tasting exercises at CIAC and other
community activities. So successful have been these rabbit sensitization
campaigns, that the demand for rabbit meat are currently far outstripping
supply with several new restaurants demanding rabbit meat.
The Project has placed itself in a good position to answer
to this rapid surge in demand for rabbit meat. Under its livestock
sub-component, provisions were made for the genetic improvement of rabbits,
sheep and goats on the island. Two prolific and high meat value breeds of
rabbits, the California White and the New Zealand White have been imported with
the aim of multiplication and distribution to farmers. These animals are reared
at the Beausejour Agricultural Complex and the first batch of twenty-three (23)
rabbits was issued in June of this year to farmers and Schools in the South.
The Project understands its target group, which comprises principally of rural
poor households and has therefore developed two separate schemes for issuing of
rabbits. One scheme is the Revolving Animal Fund Scheme (RAF) where poor
beneficiaries who cannot afford to pay for the rabbits will be given a pair
with the responsibility of returning the pair after they have given birth to
make them available to another household. Ten (10) rabbits have been issued
under this scheme so far. The other scheme is the Direct Purchase Scheme where
the animals are sold under full ownership to eligible farmers. Thirteen rabbits
(13) have been issued under this scheme so far. A similar scheme is planned for
Sheep and Goats and a large number of Barbados Black Belly Sheep have been
procured as initial Breeding Stock, and a selected number of Anglo-Nubian goats
will be arriving later this year. The genetic improvement of local stock will
lead to increase meat production and it is hoped will improve the economic
situation of many poor rural households.
UP – HILL TASKS
though the Project has enjoyed some successes during its
short life, it has not always been a bed of roses. Obstacles nevertheless arise
from time to time and have to be dealt with if Project objectives and maximum
possible benefits are to be derived from the Project activities. In the Credit
Component of the Project there appear to be an abnormally high level of
delinquency among loan beneficiaries referred to the Credit Unions by the
Project. There appear to be a number of reasons for the inability of loan
beneficiaries to make good on their loan payments, some of them justifiable
while others are not. A number of projects have failed and are not generating
income because the natural agents have taken its toll on some and rendered them
unproductive. But there is also the issue of blatant neglect by loan
beneficiaries. The reasons for this neglect are not quite clear, but from our
standpoint many of them may lie in the initial screening process of these individuals.
The issue of beneficiaries putting up some form of collateral has been
suggested informally by the Credit Unions but this initiative defeats a
fundamental underlying principal of the Project which is the targeting of
resource-poor rural communities many of whose members may not have any
collateral and are in dire need of assistance. What is evident here however, is
that this problem is continuing to loom over the Credit Component of the
Project and much effort should be directed towards an acceptable solution if
this component is to continue to provide the service it potentially can to
hundreds of impoverish rural farming households in the Project’s target region.
In the case of the CIACs, it can also be said that although
some CIACs function well and their involvement at the community level have
produced and are continuing to produce many tangible benefits, others have not
faired so well. The factors for the inefficacy of some CIACs are varied, but
among them one can cite, infighting for leadership roles, apathy towards
communal work, and also, the fact that these Committees are voluntary and
requires a high level of dedication to community and self to be an active
member. The low level of social capital in some of these communities may also
in itself be a contributing factor to the difficulties that these CIACs
encounter in their operations.
Another critical problem is that participation and support
from some key institutions has not been all that commendable. The Project
relies heavily on established institutions with their framework to reach and
monitor Project activities at the Community level, but the officers of some of
these institutions have not been too cooperative and have seriously affected
the match of activities in some areas. What makes this problem even more acute
is the large number of simultaneous activities which the Project is undertaking
at any given time and information from which is vital for the decision making
process of the Project Coordination Team. It is understood that rural
development is a complex issue. It is therefore imperative that all
participating institutions carry out their role to their utmost best. The level
of support from these institutions must be scrutinized and adjusted if full
impact of many Project activities is to be realized.
OUTLOOK FOR THE FUTURE
The future outlook of the Project looks promising. In the
face of impending moral, social and economic degradation, the Project is
working confidently in the direction of achieving all of its objectives.
However, a reduction in rural poverty and an improvement in the distribution of
income among rural communities in the target region remain central to the
ideology and focus of the Project Coordination Team. It is hoped that the St.
Lucia Rural Enterprise Project will go a long way in setting the infrastructure
for long-term sustainable socioeconomic development in the target region and in
the country as a whole.
E-mail: